The word "wert hostile to" may seem like an odd spelling, but it is actually a somewhat outdated form of the phrase "were hostile to." In IPA phonetic transcription, it would be represented as /wɜr ˈhɑstl tu/. The use of "wert" instead of "were" is an archaic way of indicating the past tense of "to be." Overall, this spelling is not commonly used in modern writing, but can be found in older texts or as a deliberate stylistic choice.
"Wert hostile to" is an archaic expression that combines an obsolete verb form "wert" meaning "were" with the adjective "hostile" and the preposition "to" to denote a state of antagonism or enmity towards something or someone. This phrase implies a strong negative sentiment or opposition and signifies a hostile attitude, mindset, or disposition towards a particular entity, idea, or individual.
The term "hostile" refers to an aggressive or unfriendly behavior, whereas "to" indicates the direction or target of this antagonism. When combined, the phrase "wert hostile to" implies a deliberate act of opposing or showing animosity towards a certain subject. It can suggest a strong resistance, disagreement, or ill will towards someone or something, often accompanied by a desire to harm or undermine.
Given the usage of "wert" in this construction, it should be noted that this form is no longer widely employed in modern English. It represents the second-person singular form of the past tense of the verb "to be" and was more prevalent in older literary or poetic works. Consequently, the phrase "wert hostile to" is considered archaic and typically appears in older texts or those aiming to emulate older linguistic styles.
In conclusion, "wert hostile to" signifies a state of being in which one is actively opposed, antagonistic, or unfriendly towards a specific object, concept, or person, and serves to emphasize a strong negative sentiment or disposition.