"Wast of consequence" is a phrase that dates back to the 16th century and is derived from the Middle English word "wast," meaning "waste" or "ruin," and the Latin word "consequentia," meaning "result" or "outcome."
The term refers to a person, action, or event that is considered unimportant, inconsequential, or of little significance in the grand scheme of things. It suggests that the matter at hand lacks importance or relevance to a particular context, whether it be a specific situation, a broader societal issue, or a larger debate.
A "wast of consequence" is typically used to describe something that is trivial, insignificant, or lacks impact and consequence. It often implies that one's efforts, time, or resources given to such matter is wasteful or could be better utilized elsewhere. It may also suggest that the person or object being referred to lacks any meaningful influence, worth, or relevance.
In essence, "wast of consequence" is a term used to dismiss or diminish the importance or relevance of someone or something, suggesting that it is not deserving of attention, consideration, or value. It is a phrase often employed to indicate that the matter being discussed or evaluated is trivial or does not hold any real significance in the overall context.
