Pronunciation: [wɒst ˈe͡ɪbə͡l tuː] (IPA) 
The correct spelling of the phrase "wast able to" should actually be "was able to." The reason for this is that "wast" is an archaic form of the word "was" and is no longer commonly used. In IPA phonetic transcription, "was able to" would be transcribed as /wɑz ˈeɪbəl tu/. It is important to use proper spelling and grammar in written communication to avoid confusion and ensure clear communication.
The phrase "wast able to" is a non-standard and archaic form of the phrase "was able to." "Wast" is an old second-person singular form of the verb "to be" in the past tense, and "able to" is a phrase that implies capability or proficiency. The combination of these words, "wast able to," indicates the past ability or skill of an individual or subject.
In its original context, "wast able to" was used during the Middle English period, dating back to the 13th and 14th centuries. It was derived from Old English, where "wast" was the second-person singular form of the verb "be" in the past tense, and "able to" denoted competence or aptitude for a particular action.
In modern English, "was able to" is the standard form used to convey that someone possessed the capability or skill to accomplish a specific task or achieve a certain outcome in the past. It signifies that an individual had the necessary resources, knowledge, or attributes to successfully complete an action. The phrase is often used to describe past achievements, accomplishments, or successes.
For example, "Despite facing numerous obstacles, she wast able to solve the complex puzzle and win the competition." Here, "wast able to" signifies the subject's past capacity to solve the puzzle, showcasing their skills and expertise in overcoming challenges. Overall, "wast able to" is an antiquated construction, with the modern equivalent being "was able to."
