The spelling of the term "hadst no part of" is unique and may seem confusing to a reader who is unfamiliar with older forms of English. However, when transcribed phonetically using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), it becomes easier to understand. "Hadst," pronounced /hædst/, is derived from the Middle English word "had," which means "to have." The "-st" suffix indicates the second person singular past tense. "No" is pronounced /noʊ/, and "part" is pronounced /pɑːrt/. Together, they form an archaic phrase meaning "you did not have any involvement."
"Hadst no part of" is a phrase originating from Early Modern English and can be deciphered through the analysis of its individual components. The word "hadst" is an archaic form of the verb "to have," used specifically in the second person singular form of the past tense. "No" is a negating adverb, implying the absence or lack of something, while "part" refers to a portion, share, or involvement. "Of" functions as a preposition indicating possession, relationship, or association.
When combined in the phrase "hadst no part of," it suggests a state or condition where someone did not possess or possess any share or involvement in a particular matter or event. It denotes the absence of participation, engagement, or association with something. This phrase is typically used in a metaphoric or figurative sense, conveying that someone was not included, considered, affected, or contributing to a specific situation, conversation, activity, or decision-making process.
For instance, if someone asserts, "You hadst no part of this discussion," it implies that the person addressed was not involved, included, or consulted in the conversation or decision-making process mentioned. It may also imply a lack of responsibility or accountability for the outcome of the discussion.
Overall, "hadst no part of" implies a complete lack of inclusion, involvement, share, or participation in a specific context or event.