The correct spelling of the phrase "wert one duty to" is actually "were our duty to". The word "were" is the past tense of the verb "to be" and is pronounced /wɜːr/, while "our" is a possessive pronoun pronounced /aʊər/. The confusion in spelling may stem from the similarity in pronunciation of "were" and "wert", which is an archaic form of the verb "to be". It is important to ensure proper spelling and phrasing to avoid miscommunication or misunderstandings.
"Wert one duty to" is an archaic phrase that combines the verb "wert" (a second person singular past tense of "be") with "one duty to," suggesting duty or obligation towards something or someone.
The phrase implies a sense of responsibility or moral obligation placed upon an individual to fulfill their duty or commitment. In this context, duty refers to a set of obligations or tasks that one is expected or required to perform.
However, it is important to note that "wert one duty to" is an archaic construction and no longer used in modern English. The phrase is reminiscent of older forms of English, particularly the Shakespearean era, and is rarely encountered in contemporary language.
It is worth mentioning that in modern English, the phrase would commonly be expressed using more current language structures. For instance, one might say "It was your duty to" or "If it was your responsibility to." These phrases would convey a similar meaning to the archaic construction "wert one duty to" but in a more contemporary manner.
In conclusion, "wert one duty to" is an outdated phrase that indicates an individual's responsibility towards fulfilling a particular obligation or duty.