The phrase "were cross purposes" is a way to describe a situation where two or more people misunderstand each other's intentions or goals. The spelling of the word "cross" in this context is pronounced with a short "o" sound /krɒs/, rather than the long "o" sound /kroʊs/ used in the word "across." The phrase is often used in the context of miscommunication or lack of coordination, and is spelled exactly as it is written – "were cross purposes."
"Being at cross purposes" refers to a situation in which two or more people hold opposing views, goals, or intentions, leading to a state of mutual misunderstanding or conflicting actions. This term is often used to describe a lack of agreement or coordination between individuals or groups, resulting in a failure to achieve a common objective or work together effectively.
When parties are "at cross purposes," their actions or statements hinder rather than facilitate effective communication or cooperation. It implies a fundamental difference in understanding, interests, or objectives, leading to unproductive or contradictory outcomes. This situation can arise due to differences in perspectives, misinterpretation of information, a failure to communicate effectively, or simply a lack of clarity about desired outcomes.
The phrase is derived from an analogy to two people or objects moving in different directions, intersecting at a crossroad, and colliding due to their divergent paths. It illustrates the idea that the intentions or actions of one party interfere with those of another, impeding progress or causing confusion.
Resolving a situation where individuals or groups are at cross purposes often requires open and honest communication, active listening, and a willingness to consider alternative viewpoints. By working towards a common understanding, embracing compromise, and clarifying goals and expectations, parties can successfully navigate their differences and align their efforts to achieve shared objectives.