"Was comparable to" is a phrase used to describe a situation in which two or more things can be considered similar in certain aspects, qualities, or characteristics. It implies that they have a similar level, degree, or standard of comparison, suggesting that they have a similar level of worth, value, or importance in relation to a specific criteria or context.
When we say that two things "were comparable to" each other, we mean that they shared common attributes, features, or performance that allows them to be compared or evaluated against each other. This comparison could be based on various aspects, such as size, shape, functionality, quality, significance, or effectiveness.
The phrase "were comparable to" signifies that the similarities between the two things are of sufficient magnitude or relevance to warrant a meaningful or valid comparison. In other words, it suggests that the two entities or concepts are on a similar level or share similar attributes that enable them to be likened or equated to each other to some extent. This phrase acknowledges the existence of resemblances or parallels between the two compared entities, which facilitates evaluating and drawing conclusions about their similarities or shared characteristics.
Overall, when we say that two things "were comparable to" each other, it implies that they were alike or similar in a significant and noticeable manner, thereby allowing for a justified and meaningful comparison between them.
