When two or more individuals or parties are "at odds," it implies that they are in a state of disagreement, conflict, or discord. This idiom captures the notion of being in disagreement or having opposing views on a particular matter or issue. It implies a lack of agreement or mutual understanding, often resulting in tension, animosity, or opposition between the parties involved.
The phrase "were at odds" is commonly used to describe situations where there is a disagreement or conflict of interest, be it in personal relationships, professional settings, or broader societal contexts. It signifies a divergence of opinions, values, goals, or perspectives that prevents harmony, unity, or cooperation.
Being "at odds" may arise due to different understandings, conflicting priorities, competing interests, contrasting beliefs, or incompatible objectives. Such disagreements can stem from various factors like cultural differences, political ideologies, personal preferences, or varying interpretations of information or events.
When individuals or parties are at odds, it often necessitates some form of resolution or reconciliation to restore harmony or move forward. This may involve open communication, negotiation, compromise, or finding common ground. However, in some cases, being at odds could also lead to irreparable damage to relationships or undermine the possibility of mutual understanding or cooperation.
In summary, the phrase "were at odds" conveys a state of disagreement, conflict, or discord between two or more parties, highlighting their divergent views or interests and suggesting the need for resolution or reconciliation.
