The correct spelling of the phrase "wast over place" is actually "wrought over place". The confusion may arise due to the similar pronunciation of "wast" and "wrought". In IPA phonetic transcription, "wrought" is pronounced as /rɔt/, while "wast" is pronounced as /wɑst/. "Wrought" means shaped or formed by hammering, while "over place" simply means across or throughout a certain location. It's important to remember the correct spelling to avoid any confusion or miscommunication.
"Wast over place" is a phrase that does not have an established dictionary definition. It seems to be a combination of two separate words: "wast" and "over place." However, individually, these words do have definitions which can provide some insight into the potential meaning of the phrase.
The word "wast" is the archaic form of the verb "to waste," which means to use or consume something excessively or without necessity, to cause something to be used or consumed in this manner, or to gradually deteriorate over time. It can also refer to the act of directing something improperly or ineffectively, resulting in a loss or inefficiency.
On the other hand, "over place" does not have a widely recognized definition. However, by considering the individual meanings of the two words, "over" could imply being in excess or surpassing a certain limit, while "place" usually refers to a location, area, or position in space.
Given this analysis, as a speculative definition, "wast over place" might imply a situation or state in which resources, time, energy, or other aspects are being unnecessarily or excessively consumed, or a condition where something is deteriorating due to improper use or handling. It could also suggest the occurrence of inefficiency, wastefulness, or an imbalance in the way things are managed or utilized within a given location or context.
Please note that this interpretation is based on the meanings of the constituent words and not an established definition of the phrase as a whole, which may not exist.