The correct spelling of the phrase "wast lazy" is actually "was lazy." This mistake often occurs due to the confusion of the archaic form of the verb "to be," which is "wast," with the past tense form "was." In IPA phonetic transcription, "wast" is pronounced /wɑst/ while "was" is pronounced /wʌz/. It's important to pay attention to small details such as spelling and context to ensure proper communication in written and spoken language.
There does not appear to be a widely recognized term or phrase "wast lazy" in the English language. The word "wast" appears to be an archaic form of the word "was" that was used during Middle English. On the other hand, "lazy" is a term that describes a lack of motivation or willingness to exert effort, often associated with being inactive or avoiding work.
However, if we were to interpret "wast lazy" as a phrase with "wast" being the Middle English form of "was" and "lazy" retaining its modern meaning, we could attempt to provide a definition. In such a case, "wast lazy" could imply the past tense of laziness, suggesting that someone had a history of being lethargic or lacking motivation in the past.
It's important to note that this interpretation and definition are purely speculative and based on just one possible understanding of "wast lazy." Without further context or clarification, it is not possible to establish an accurate or commonly accepted definition for this combination of words.