Pronunciation: [wɒst ɪnˈaktɪv] (IPA) 
The correct spelling of "wast inactive" is "wasn't active." The apostrophe represents the missing "o" in "was not" and "inactive" is simply spelled as normal. In phonetic transcription, "wasn't" would be [wɒznt] and "active" would be [ˈæktɪv]. It's important to use the correct spelling to clearly convey the intended meaning in written communication.
"Wast inactive" is not a common or recognized term in the English language. It seems to be a combination of two words, "wast" and "inactive," that are meant to be read together. However, to provide a dictionary definition, we would need to consider both words separately:
1. Wast: "Wast" is an archaic form of the verb "be" in the second-person singular past tense. It was commonly used in Middle English and Early Modern English but is now considered obsolete or used in specific contexts such as poetry or historical texts. It is the past tense form of "art," which means "are." For example, "thou wast happy" would mean "you were happy."
2. Inactive: "Inactive" is an adjective that describes something or someone not engaged in any form of activity or not involved in physical or mental exertion. It suggests a lack of action, movement, energy, or participation. For instance, an inactive person may spend excessive amounts of time being sedentary or avoiding tasks that require effort. Inactive can also describe an object or a device not currently functioning or performing its intended purpose.
As "wast inactive" appears to be an incomplete or incorrect phrase, it does not hold a clear definition in the English language. It is advised to consult further sources or provide additional context to accurately define the intended meaning.
