The correct spelling of the phrase "wast in effect" is actually "was't in effect," which translates to "was it in effect." The contraction "was't" is a shortened form of "was it," commonly used in Old English. The pronunciation of "was't" is /wɑːst/, with the first vowel being pronounced as "ah" and the final "t" being silent. Despite its archaic usage, "was't" in effect is still used in literature and poetry to emphasize the antiquity of the text.
"Wast in effect" is a phrase commonly used to describe a situation or condition that is essentially ineffective or futile. It implies that something is a waste or a useless endeavor, lackluster in its impact or outcome. The term "wast" is an archaic form of the word "was," indicating a state of existence or occurrence in the past.
When something is described as being "in effect," it means that it is currently in operation, active, or functioning. However, when combined with the word "wast," it suggests that despite being operational, it is still ineffective or pointless.
The phrase may be used to refer to various scenarios, such as a rule, law, or policy that is technically in place but lacks practicality, influence, or desired results. For example, a wast in effect could describe an obsolete rule that has not been enforced for years. Similarly, it could describe a bureaucratic procedure that is required but does not contribute to the efficiency or effectiveness of an organization.
Overall, "wast in effect" refers to the state of something being ineffectual despite its existence or activation. It conveys a sense of futility, suggesting that the subject matter is essentially worthless or of no significant value in achieving its intended purpose.