The phrase "wast at fault" may seem like an archaic spelling of "was at fault," but it actually reflects the pronunciation of the Middle English language. In IPA phonetic transcription, "wast" would be pronounced as /wɑst/ and "at" as /ət/. This spelling convention persisted until the Modern English period, during which the word "was" gradually replaced "wast" as the past tense of "be." "Wast at fault" can still be found in historical texts, but it is not commonly used in contemporary English.
The phrase "was not at fault" refers to a situation in which someone is not responsible or to blame for an incident, mistake, or wrongdoing. This phrase is typically used to absolve someone from any wrongdoing or liability for a particular event or situation.
"Was not at fault" implies that the individual did not act negligently, commit an error, or engage in any behavior that contributed to the negative outcome. This means that they cannot be held accountable or be considered responsible for the consequences that have arisen. The phrase can be used in various contexts, such as car accidents, legal disputes, conflicts, or any other scenario where fault or culpability may be attributed.
When someone claims that they "were not at fault," they are asserting that they did not cause or contribute to the problem at hand. It can be used as a defense or a way to deny responsibility for their actions, emphasizing their innocence in the matter.
The phrase is often used in legal proceedings, insurance claims, or investigations to determine who is liable for damages or when assigning blame. It indicates that an individual should not be held accountable for the negative outcome or repercussions of a particular situation, as their actions or decisions were not the cause of the problem.