The spelling of the phrase "wast an adjunct of" may seem unfamiliar or archaic to many readers. However, it is simply an older version of the phrase "was an adjunct of" and is pronounced /wɑst ən ˈædʒʌŋkt əv/. The "wast" part is the past tense of "be" and the "an" is an old-fashioned version of "a." "Adjunct" means something that is added or attached and in this context, it refers to something that is subsidiary or ancillary.
The phrase "wast an adjunct of" is not a common phrase that can be found in standard dictionaries. However, we can infer its meaning by examining the individual words and their context.
The word "wast" is an archaic form of "was" used in the second person singular past tense. It signifies an action or a state of being that occurred in the past.
The word "an" is an indefinite article used before a noun to indicate that it is one of a general category or kind
"Adjunct" refers to something that is attached or connected to another thing, typically to provide additional or subordinate importance.
Combining these words, we can deduce that "wast an adjunct of" refers to a state or condition where something or someone was functionally linked as a subordinate or additional component of another entity or concept. It suggests that the subject was not a primary or independent entity, but rather an accessory or complement to something else.
The lack of context prevents us from offering a specific example, but one could say "He wast an adjunct of the company" to imply that the individual in question held a secondary or supporting role within the company, rather than occupying a central or significant position.
It is worth noting that this phrase may not have widespread usage in modern English and might be limited to specific contexts or literature.