"Was subsequent to" refers to something or an event that occurred or happened after another specific thing or event. The term "subsequent" indicates a later point in time or a later occurrence.
When a particular entity, action, or circumstance is said to be "subsequent to" something else, it suggests a sequence or a chronological order, where the second entity, action, or circumstance comes after the first one. It implies that the second event could not have happened or existed without the existence of the first one.
For example, if we say "The appointment of the new CEO was subsequent to the resignation of the previous CEO," we are elucidating that the appointment took place after the resignation. In this context, the appointment would not have taken place if the previous CEO had not resigned.
Similarly, if we state "The discovery of electricity was subsequent to numerous experiments conducted by various scientists," we are signifying that the discovery of electricity happened as a result of several experiments carried out by different scientists. The discovery would not have been possible without the prior experiments.
Therefore, the phrase "was subsequent to" denotes a relationship in which one event, action, or circumstance is directly influenced, caused, or follows another event, action, or circumstance.
