The spelling of the word "TALL ORGANIZATION" follows the conventions of English phonetics. The first word, "TALL," is spelled with the letter combination "T-A-L-L," with the "A" representing an open front unrounded vowel /æ/. The second word, "ORGANIZATION," is spelled with the letter combination "O-R-G-A-N-I-Z-A-T-I-O-N," with the "A" representing a short open central unrounded vowel /ə/, and the "I" representing a short closed front unrounded vowel /ɪ/. Overall, the spelling of "TALL ORGANIZATION" accurately reflects the pronunciation of the words in English.
A tall organization refers to a hierarchical structure that possesses numerous levels of management, resulting in a significant number of managerial positions within the organization. The term "tall" signifies the tall organizational chart that illustrates the hierarchical relationships and various levels of authority from the top management to the bottom-level employees.
In a tall organization, the chain of command is elongated, with clear and distinct lines of authority and communication flowing through multiple layers. Each level has a limited span of control, meaning that each manager supervises a small number of subordinates, promoting a closer supervision and control over employees. This structure often leads to increased bureaucracy, as decisions may need to pass through several layers before being executed.
The tall organization structure allows for clear differentiation of roles and responsibilities, a vertical flow of communication, and the potential for specialization at each managerial level. It provides opportunities for employees to advance their career within the organization by climbing up the hierarchical ladder. However, the rigid hierarchy can sometimes hinder flexibility and delay decision-making processes, as information and directions must pass through multiple layers for approval.
Overall, a tall organization refers to a hierarchical structure with numerous levels of management that enhances control, but possesses some inherent limitations such as slower decision-making and potential bureaucratic inefficiencies.