The Stop Online Piracy Act (IPA: stɑp ˈɒnlaɪn ˈpaɪrəsi ˈækt) was a controversial bill introduced in the United States Congress in 2011. The bill aimed to curb copyright infringement by allowing the US Department of Justice to seek court orders against websites accused of hosting or facilitating pirated content. The spelling of the word "piracy" in the bill's title is represented by the phonetic symbol /ˈpaɪrəsi/, which indicates the pronunciation of the word with a long "i" sound in the second syllable.
The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is a proposed legislation introduced in the United States to combat the issue of online piracy and copyright infringement. The act aims to provide enhanced legal tools to copyright holders and law enforcement agencies to tackle the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material on the internet.
SOPA entails provisions that empower copyright holders to take legal action against websites and online platforms that enable or facilitate copyright infringement. Under the act, copyright holders can seek court orders to block access to infringing websites, require search engines to delist such sites from their search results, and demand payment processors and advertising networks to sever ties with infringing platforms.
This legislation also imposes liability on internet service providers (ISPs) for failing to enforce measures against infringing websites, thereby encouraging ISPs to monitor and regulate content on their platforms more vigorously. Additionally, SOPA targets foreign websites involved in online piracy, allowing U.S. authorities to take legal action against non-U.S. platforms that affect U.S. copyrights.
Critics argue that SOPA's broad language and severe provisions could potentially lead to excessive censorship, hinder online innovation, and infringe upon freedom of speech. Concerns exist that legitimate websites and user-generated content could be wrongly targeted or unjustly shut down due to the act's stringent measures. SOPA has been a subject of substantial debate, as supporters highlight its potential to protect intellectual property rights, while opponents emphasize the need for a more balanced approach that does not compromise other fundamental values on the internet.