"Not strictly enforced" refers to a situation where rules, laws, or regulations are not being thoroughly adhered to or carried out with a high level of strictness or consistency. It suggests that there is some degree of leniency, flexibility, or lack of commitment in enforcing the established guidelines.
When rules are not strictly enforced, there may be an understanding that occasional deviations or violations will be tolerated, either due to resource constraints, competing priorities, or a perceived lack of urgency. This can result in less severe consequences or a higher tolerance for non-compliance.
Such a scenario may arise for various reasons. It could be due to a lack of manpower or resources to adequately monitor and enforce compliance. Alternatively, it could be a conscious decision made by those in authority to prioritize more critical matters or to allow for some level of discretion in enforcing the rules, thereby considering individual circumstances and exercising judgment.
It is important to note that when rules are not strictly enforced, it does not imply that they are completely disregarded or irrelevant. Rather, it indicates that there may be a less stringent implementation, leading to a potential variance in the degree of compliance among individuals or groups.
In summary, "not strictly enforced" signifies a situation where rules or regulations are not consistently and rigidly applied, allowing for some level of leniency, discretion, or flexibility in compliance.
