"More unsupported" is a comparative term that describes a situation or statement that lacks evidence, proof, or substantiation to a greater extent than something else. The word "unsupported" refers to the absence or insufficiency of evidence or logical backing for a claim, argument, or idea. When it is modified by "more," it indicates an increased level or degree of that lack of support.
In contexts such as debates, discussions, scientific research, or legal proceedings, claims or theories need to be substantiated by relevant evidence and logical reasoning. However, when a statement is termed as "more unsupported," it suggests that it is even less validated, validated to a lesser extent, or deemed less plausible compared to other claims in the same category.
A statement or argument can be deemed "more unsupported" if it lacks any reliable data, facts, expert opinions, logical consistency, or empirical evidence that could confirm or substantiate its validity. This term highlights the inadequacy of support for a specific assertion or proposition, drawing attention to its potential weakness, untrustworthiness, or lack of reliability. Consequently, a "more unsupported" viewpoint or claim may be seen as less credible, persuasive, or convincing in discussions or discourse, as it is considered to be based on weaker grounds, leaving significant doubts about its truthfulness or accuracy.
