GORDON GEKKO Meaning and
Definition
-
Gordon Gekko is a fictional character who first appeared in the 1987 film "Wall Street," directed by Oliver Stone. He is a wealthy and unscrupulous corporate raider portrayed by actor Michael Douglas, for which he won an Academy Award for Best Actor. The character of Gordon Gekko is widely recognized as a representation of the greed and excesses of the 1980s Wall Street era.
In popular culture, the name "Gordon Gekko" often refers to a ruthless and unprincipled businessman who is solely driven by profit and willing to engage in unethical practices to achieve his goals. This definition holds especially true in the context of finance and the corporate world.
The character's famous quote, "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good," encapsulates the essence of the persona attributed to Gordon Gekko. It implies a belief that ambition and self-interest are the driving forces behind economic success.
Due to the enduring popularity of the film, the name Gordon Gekko has become synonymous with the image of the quintessential corporate villain. It is frequently used to describe individuals or situations associated with the pursuit of wealth at any cost, often disregarding moral values and social responsibility.
Etymology of GORDON GEKKO
The word "Gordon Gekko" originated as a fictional character's name in the 1987 movie "Wall Street". The character, portrayed by Michael Douglas, is a ruthless and greedy Wall Street investor. The name "Gordon" is a Scottish surname meaning "spacious fort" or "hilltop", while "Gekko" is a Japanese word for "gecko" – a type of lizard known for its ability to blended with its surroundings and adapt quickly. The combination of these two names was likely chosen to convey the character's cunning and opportunistic nature, symbolizing his ability to navigate the financial world stealthily and emerge as a dominant force. However, it is important to note that the etymology of these names in relation to their meaning or relevance to the character is speculative and not rooted in any concrete linguistic history.
