The spelling of the phrase "didst business in" may seem confusing, but it is a proper use of archaic English. In IPA phonetic transcription, it would be pronounced /dɪdəst ˈbɪznɪs ɪn/. "Didst" is the archaic second-person singular past tense form of "do," and "business" is pronounced as it is today. The use of "in" at the end is also common in old English, as opposed to the modern "with." This phrase would have been commonly used in Shakespearean plays and other literature from that time period.
The phrase "didst business in" is a somewhat archaic construction commonly found in older forms of English literature, particularly in works written during the Renaissance period. It is derived from the combination of two words: "didst" and "business."
The term "didst" is the second-person singular past tense of the verb "do" in the archaic form, usually associated with the Early Modern English era. It signifies an action or event that was performed or carried out by an individual in the past.
On the other hand, "business" refers to various activities, tasks, or occupations engaged in for the purpose of profit or personal gain. It denotes the actions involved in managing, conducting, or pursuing a particular enterprise or commercial affair.
When used together, the phrase "didst business in" implies that an individual or group of individuals were involved in performing or undertaking various tasks, activities, or matters related to profit, occupation, or trade in the past. It suggests the existence of some form of commercial or economic enterprise being conducted or managed by the subject of the sentence.
Overall, the term "didst business in" provides a glimpse into historical texts and literature, where it was once commonly employed to describe past actions or engagements within the realm of commerce or professional activities.