The phrase "Curse of Ham" refers to a Biblical story in which Ham, the son of Noah, is believed to have been cursed by his father for seeing him drunk and naked. The spelling of this phrase can be explained using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as /kɜːs əv hæm/ where the stress is on the first syllable of "curse" and the second syllable of "Ham". This phrase has been used historically to justify racism and slavery, but there is no evidence in the Bible to support such beliefs.
The "Curse of Ham" refers to a biblical narrative found in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. The story entails an event where Noah, after surviving the Great Flood, plants a vineyard and indulges in drinking wine. Due to excessive intoxication, Noah becomes unconscious and lies naked in his tent. Upon noticing his father's exposed state, Ham, one of Noah's sons, informs his brothers, Shem and Japheth, about it.
However, rather than covering Noah with respect and discretion, Ham appears to mock or dishonor him in some way. When Noah awakes and learns about Ham's actions, he feelingly pronounces a curse upon Ham's offspring. This curse is believed to have resulted in Ham's descendants, particularly Canaan, being enslaved or destined to serve the descendants of his brothers, Shem and Japheth. Consequently, the "Curse of Ham" has often been misused throughout history to justify and perpetuate racial discrimination, and more specifically, to support the enslavement of African people.
It is essential to note that the interpretation of this biblical narrative has been the subject of much debate and controversy. Many theologians, scholars, and religious communities challenge the notion that this narrative can be used to justify or legitimize any form of discrimination or racial superiority. Nevertheless, the "Curse of Ham" is a historical term that encapsulates the understanding of a curse placed upon the descendants of Ham, originating from the biblical account in the book of Genesis.