The correct spelling of the phrase "argued in to" is actually "argued into." The word "into" is a preposition that indicates movement or direction towards the inside of something. The phonetic transcription of "into" is /ˈɪn.tuː/. The confusion with the incorrect spelling of "in to" may come from the fact that "in" is also a preposition that is commonly used in conjunction with "to," but it implies location rather than movement. The correct phonetic transcription of "in to" would be /ɪn tu/.
"Argued into" is a verb phrase that means to convince or persuade someone to adopt a particular viewpoint, belief, or course of action through the use of reasoning, debate, or discussion. It implies the act of presenting sound and logical arguments that gradually influence or sway someone's opinion.
When someone is "argued into" a certain perspective, it suggests that they were initially reluctant or held a different point of view, but the persuasive power of the arguments presented led them to change their position. This phrase often pertains to discussions where different ideas or opinions are being debated, and wherein one party successfully convinces another to reconsider their stance, usually by offering compelling evidence or logical reasoning.
Being "argued into" something implies the presence of an effective rhetorician or debater who uses their skills to sway others. It conveys the idea of a gradual process where the person being argued into something undergoes a transformation in their thinking or belief system.
For example, imagine a debate about the harmful effects of smoking. Someone who is a heavy smoker might initially be reluctant to admit that smoking is detrimental to their health. Through a compelling discussion, supported by scientific evidence and personal anecdotes, another person might succeed in "arguing them into" the belief that smoking is indeed harmful. As a result, the reluctant smoker accepts the new perspective and eventually makes the decision to quit smoking.